OKKProxy vs Flyproxy: Residential IP Comparison for Cross-Border E-Commerce and Multi-Account Operations

In cross-border e-commerce, multi-account management, data collection, and advertising campaigns, residential IP proxies are essential. Among many service providers, OKKProxy and Flyproxy are widely used. This article compares them across multiple dimensions to help you choose the best proxy service.

1. Global Coverage and IP Quantity

Proxy Service	Global Node Coverage	Available IPs
OKKProxy	200+ countries/regions	~100 million residential IPs
Flyproxy	170+ countries/regions	~70 million residential IPs

Analysis:
OKKProxy offers broader global coverage and more IPs, making it more flexible and reliable for users who need access to multiple regions or frequent IP rotation.

2. IP Types and Anonymity

OKKProxy: Provides real residential IPs with high anonymity, reducing the risk of being flagged as bots or abnormal activity.
Flyproxy: Offers residential IPs, but some nodes may be hybrid (residential + datacenter), which can pose risks on sensitive platforms.

3. Speed and Stability

OKKProxy: Response time under 0.5 seconds, stable for long-term connections, ideal for data scraping and multi-account operations.
Flyproxy: Slightly higher average response time; peak nodes may experience temporary delays.

4. Pricing Comparison (Pay-per-GB)

Flyproxy

$2.5/GB, relatively expensive, flexible plans, but peak node speeds may be limited and coverage is narrower.

OKKProxy

$1.5/GB, high cost-performance ratio, pay-as-you-go, global node coverage, suitable for large-scale data collection and cross-border e-commerce.

Analysis:
OKKProxy offers better value for long-term, high-volume usage; Flyproxy is more suitable for small-scale or temporary use.

5. User Experience and Support

OKKProxy: Intuitive dashboard, supports multiple protocols (HTTP/S, SOCKS5), responsive customer support, complete documentation.
Flyproxy: Simple interface, supports HTTP/S; SOCKS5 requires manual setup, more learning curve for advanced usage.

6. Conclusion & Recommendations

Long-term, high-volume, cross-border multi-account operations: Choose OKKProxy. High anonymity and global coverage reduce the risk of bans.
Short-term testing or small-scale use: Flyproxy meets basic needs but has lower stability and fewer node options.
Price-sensitive users: OKKProxy’s pay-per-GB pricing is flexible and cost-effective.